Toro vs. Hunter Irrigation: Brand Comparison for Minnesota Installation

Two contractors propose Hunter systems for your Minneapolis-area yard. Your husband, a former installer, prefers Toro. Is Hunter truly better than Toro of "many years ago"?

Market Reality Check

Fifteen to twenty years ago, Toro dominated the residential market. Since approximately 2001, their residential valve and controller quality declined significantly—plastic bodies replaced brass, solenoid reliability dropped, and controller firmware had issues. Many contractors (including the author's 20-year Toro shop) switched to Hunter and Rain Bird.

Current Landscape (2024 Perspective)

• Hunter: Industry leader in gear-drive rotors (PGP, I-20), reliable controllers (Pro-C, ICC2), and innovative nozzles (MP Rotator).
• Rain Bird: Strong in spray bodies (1800 series), ESP controllers, and commercial-grade valves (PEB/PESB).
• Toro: Has improved recently (TPS series valves, Evolution controllers) but still trails in contractor preference.

Minnesota-Specific Considerations

• Freeze durability: Hunter and Rain Bird valve bodies handle freeze-thaw cycles better.
• Winterization: All brands require proper blowout; controller features like "seasonal adjust" help.
• Local support: Twin Cities suppliers stock Hunter/Rain Bird heavily; Toro parts may be special-order.

Recommendation

Go with the Hunter proposal. The contractor's familiarity means better installation, warranty support, and future service. Brand loyalty from "years ago" doesn't reflect current product reality. Your "Captain Crunch" yard deserves modern, reliable components.